Hell I’d be willing to pay full price for a key to make them an AP. The cambium mac is light years ahead. M900s would be useful for ptp pr ptmp with cambiums mac. Same with 365. Of course sync is better, but beggers rights right ? Lol
1 Like
Any inisght into this cambium?
@Chris_Bay wrote:
Hell I'd be willing to pay full price for a key to make them an AP. The cambium mac is light years ahead. M900s would be useful for ptp pr ptmp with cambiums mac. Same with 365. Of course sync is better, but beggers rights right ? Lol
+1 Actualy, +30 or so. I'd buy full AP Licenses for M900's and M3's to be able to use them as AP's. Even we don't have GPS on those two - that'd still be great. :)
1 Like
The ePMP fixed frame MAC is what airMAX airSync would have been if it was actually finished. It’s largely the same concept and execution. The new 2AC/5AC Fixed Frame mode is so much better at 6X modulation rate than ePMP, (where there is no PHY advantage over ePMP), at all channel widths, but especially at 40MHz, it’s not even funny. I’d agree with the general sentiment here, that MAC design matters!
Since this is the Elevate forum, i’ll also mention that Ubiquiti is coming out with XW backwards compatibility for 2AC/5AC Fixed Frame soon! Then XM. And then, you can see how each MAC compares on the same platform. Handling the Atheros chips is an art, one which requires frequent iteration.
You haven't posted here in 6 years and you come here and post this garbage. You sound like a little kid "airsync would have been as good as epmp if ubiquiti would have finished it" . Give us a break and it's funny you are comparing ubiquiti's ac offering to cambiums 802.11n offering since ubiquitis 802.11n offering doesn't compare. I wonder what's going to happen when cambium releases their AC gear? Hmmmmm????
1 Like
UBNT might get it ***SOOOON*** but we couldn't wait for a never ending list of firmware fixes to get it right. I can Elevate today and get predictably better service. I've also put UBNT AC FF in the same environment as an ePMP2k and the ePMP2k had about the same results with one client, but the MAC efficiencies became clear the more clients were added. UBNT always falls on its face.
It took ubnt 7 plus years to not get the M series right, why would we believe thata going to change now?
No epmp mac and air sync were not fundamentally the same. Ubnt made some slight alterations to a wifi frame, cambium literally gutted it. The onlything N left about the cambium mac is the chip they use to process the signal. They’ve gone into grest detail in some of the old webinars to what they actually did under the hood. Cambium got xm and xw compatibility at the same time, why cant ubnt ? Cambium gave a eta for a product release, qnd generally hit it. Why can’t they ? Cambium offers a completely scaleable platform with link planner to calculate realistic real world performance with an entire system, ubnt likes to promise peaks. Yeah, im pretty sure most of us has had enough with the “soon” game eith the giant promises and failure to deliver.
2 Likes
We have new Loco-M2 XW board.sysid=0xe867. Elevated it using 3.4.1 and 3.5rc7 firmware, but after flashing ethernet port is not working - huge loss of packets.
So the question.... loco-m2 model (0xe867) is supported? (some other loco-m2 elevated the same way and no problems)
Same issue here with 3.5 to nanostation m2 loco (XW board). Won't login and massive data packet loss after elevate attempt. Is the M2 loco elevate not supported?
@itvin wrote:
We have new Loco-M2 XW board.sysid=0xe867. Elevated it using 3.4.1 and 3.5rc7 firmware, but after flashing ethernet port is not working - huge loss of packets.
So the question.... loco-m2 model (0xe867) is supported? (some other loco-m2 elevated the same way and no problems)
Hi,
NanoStation Loco M2(0xe867) has been added to the list of supported devices in 3.5.1 Release.
Please contact me at fedor.trutsko(at)cambiumnetworks(dot)com and I provide you private build for it.
Official 3.5.1 will be delivered in 2 weeks approximately.
Thank you.
@AirFi wrote:
Same issue here with 3.5 to nanostation m2 loco (XW board). Won't login and massive data packet loss after elevate attempt. Is the M2 loco elevate not supported?
Hi,
In 3.5.1 Release we also added NanoStation Loco M2(0xe866) support.
Could you please check which type do you have?
Thank you.
0xe867 - will this be supported soon?
Thanks!
@AirFi wrote:
0xe867 - will this be supported soon?
Thanks!
It is already added in 3.5.1 Release.
I can send you 3.5.1 Release Candidate if you would like to try it before offcial 3.5.1 Release.
Thank you.
is there a new update list? Powerbrige m5?
In 3.5.1 only 2 new sku were added:
112 - (0xe867) ePMP Elevate NSlocoM2-V2-XW 113 - (0xe866) ePMP Elevate NSlocoM2-V3-XW
Unfortunatelly Powerbridge M5 is still out of this list.
Thank you.
@Chris_2wrote:You haven't posted here in 6 years and you come here and post this garbage. You sound like a little kid "airsync would have been as good as epmp if ubiquiti would have finished it" . Give us a break and it's funny you are comparing ubiquiti's ac offering to cambiums 802.11n offering since ubiquitis 802.11n offering doesn't compare. I wonder what's going to happen when cambium releases their AC gear? Hmmmmm????
I was right, wasn't I? What's going to happen when Cambium release their AC gear? I don't know, but, not much.... Who sells more gear, EPMP or Mx series? EPMP or xAC series? Ubiquiti sells an order of multitude more gear, so perhaps there were a little busy, but they have caught up to EPMP and they are already ahead of Cambium in this area. What's the whole reason Cambium did EPMP to begin with? Oh yeah, Ubiquiti Mx ate their business.
@twinkletoeswrote:
@Chris_2wrote:You haven't posted here in 6 years and you come here and post this garbage. You sound like a little kid "airsync would have been as good as epmp if ubiquiti would have finished it" . Give us a break and it's funny you are comparing ubiquiti's ac offering to cambiums 802.11n offering since ubiquitis 802.11n offering doesn't compare. I wonder what's going to happen when cambium releases their AC gear? Hmmmmm????
I was right, wasn't I? What's going to happen when Cambium release their AC gear? I don't know, but, not much.... Who sells more gear, EPMP or Mx series? EPMP or xAC series? Ubiquiti sells an order of multitude more gear, so perhaps there were a little busy, but they have caught up to EPMP and they are already ahead of Cambium in this area. What's the whole reason Cambium did EPMP to begin with? Oh yeah, Ubiquiti Mx ate their business.
Man, what a petty troll you are... you must have woken up on the wrong side of the bed or something or are seriously bored and begging to pick a fight. I don't come over to your playground in the UBNT forums and sh*t on your posts or Ubiquiti's radios. Both manufactures have strengths and weaknesses... both have had their share of issues... there's no one right tool for this business, and ultimately the competition helps all of us wisps. So yeah, go back to your UBNT cave unless you have something constructive or positive to say.
2 Likes
As eric stated, troll elsewhere twinkle.
Cambiums formus general have a professional feel here. Insulting and rude tactics are less than welcome.
People come here for help and useful discussions, if your unable to contribute constructively, kick rocks.
Ubnts forum is horrible because of the amount of deconstructive users.
If telling the truth is trolling, then I'm guilty!!
I agree, competition IS good for everybody. Why do you think EPMP exists to begin with!?
I'm just talking about who has the actual weight in this department...