1 BH20 Master, 2 BH20 Slaves

I asked this before, but can 1x BH20 Master support 2x BH20 Slaves as long as the slaves are within the coverage of the Master?


That’s a good question. I think I asked this same question to Canopy Tech support a few years ago and the answer provided was “no”. But, it wouldn’t hurt to try it out. The web interfaces for the BHM’s are almost identical to those of AP’s, and the BHS’s the same as SM’s. Makes you wonder…

How do you want to convince the point-to-point protocol to do a point-to-multipoint tasks?

A simple answer will suffice thank you.

Simple answer: the backhauls don’t do multipoint.

Thanks. I was hoping that the Master would do MP but it was a dream.

Index: 0 Frequency: 5840.0 MHz ESN: 0a-00-3e-f0-XX-XX
Jitter: 12 RSSI: 2097 Power Level: -55 Beacon Count: 25 BRcvW: 0
Type: SinglePoint Avail: 1 Age: 0 Lockout: 0 RegFail 0 Range: 0 feet TxBER: 0 EBcast: 0
Session Count: 0 NoLUIDS: 0 OutOfRange: 0 AuthFail: 0 EncryptFail: 0 Rescan Req: 1
FrameNumber: 1310 Color Code: 40 BeaconVersion: 1 SectorUserCount: N/A
PercentDataDwn: 50 PercentDataUpHi: 0 NumDAckSlots: 1 NumContSlots: 1 NumUAckSlots: 1


Note “type.” Acquired from the AP evaluation dialogue on a BH slave.