Yes Nathan, I will agree with Rylan... that's about the healthiest link you can have.
Unfortunately, the way the modulation breakdown is reported is a bit confusing. When a fragment is received in 256-QAM modulation, it is also counted in the lower modulations. This has to do with how OFDM technology works, and the constellation diagram of the OFDM signal.
To give a few examples, a perfect 8x link (i.e. a link that is able to achieve and maintain 256-QAM modulation) will report:
256-QAM: 25%
64-QAM: 25%
16-QAM: 25%
QPSK: 25%
just as you describe.
A link that cannot achieve 8x, but is a solid 6x link will show:
256-QAM: <1%
64-QAM: 33%
16-QAM: 33%
QPSK: 33%
In real world deployments, it would be common to see something like:
256-QAM: <1%
64-QAM: 14%
16-QAM: 42%
QPSK: 44%
which would indicate that the majority of the time, this link transmits at 4X (16-QAM), but sometimes is able to maintain 6X modulation... hope this explanation helps.