450M snmp oid issue? inError reporting but UI doesn't show any

Not sure why my original post was deleted but... having the 450M report inErrorCount in the SNMP oid but not showing in the UI.

 
snmpwalk -v2c -c ThisIsFakePassword some-access-point.amplex.net .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.14.1
 
IF-MIB::ifInErrors.1 = Counter32: 11215628
 
Yet UI shows ifInErrors 0. The counter is oddly close to the total inucastpkts count. Anyone else experiencing this?
 
 

Tim,

Please use Canopy specific OID's to get "ifInErrors" and "ifOutErrors" count.

For "ifInErrors" (.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.14) the Canopy specific OIDs are
- RF Interface - .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.1.99.0 (rfInErrorsCount)
- Ethernet Interface - .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.1.95.0 (fecInErrorsCount )

For "ifOutErrors" (.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.20) the Canopy specific OIDs are
- RF Interface - .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.1.101.0 (rfOutErrorsCount)
- Ethernet Interface - .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.1.97.0 (fecOutErrorsCount)

Best Regards,
Balaji

1 Like

@Balaji this violates RFCs.

Hi mikerev,

Yes, we recommend using Canopy sepcific OID's for discards too.


For "ifInDiscards" (.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.13) the Canopy specific OIDs are
- RF Interface - .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.1.98.0 (rfInDiscardsCount)
- Ethernet Interface - .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.1.94.0 (fecInDiscardsCount )

For "ifOutDiscards" (.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.19) the Canopy specific OIDs are
- RF Interface - .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.1.100.0 (rfInDiscardsCount)
- Ethernet Interface - .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.1.96.0 (fecInDiscardsCount )

Best Regards,

Balaji

1 Like

Dear Cambium,

Can you please either implement IF-MIB correctly (by supplying the same data as you report at your "custom" OIDS) or completely drop IF-MIB support?

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2863

2 Likes

IF-MIB is an industrly wide standard and there are RFCs for it. This deviation from that standard means that everyone using LibreNMS and any other NMS that respects IF-MIB and also operates with Canopy PMP450 is receiving inaccurate ethernet error and discard metrics right?

1 Like