# Best Practices For Ethernet Performance Test RFC 2544

**URL:** https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/best-practices-for-ethernet-performance-test-rfc-2544/47721
**Category:** ePMP
**Created:** [October 14, 2016, 9:26pm UTC](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/best-practices-for-ethernet-performance-test-rfc-2544/47721 "2016-10-14T21:26:07Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jochoab](https://d10gw3vjmzyp8.cloudfront.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/c57346/32.png) [@jochoab](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/u/jochoab)
#### Post date: [October 14, 2016, 9:26pm UTC](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/best-practices-for-ethernet-performance-test-rfc-2544/47721/1 "2016-10-14T21:26:07Z")

</div>

Just trying to see if Cambium has recommendations on the setup for the RFC 2544. I have ran several test on multiple PTP solutions and sometimes the latency, jitter and frame loss exceed the expected values. I know this radios has limitations in the processing of frames 13000 pps regardless the frame size. Do you have any suggestions? Thanks,

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Daniel\_Gracia](https://d10gw3vjmzyp8.cloudfront.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/f9ae1b/32.png) [@Daniel\_Gracia](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/u/Daniel_Gracia)
#### Post date: [October 22, 2016, 4:30pm UTC](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/best-practices-for-ethernet-performance-test-rfc-2544/47721/2 "2016-10-22T16:30:40Z")

</div>

RFC2544 tests should be just hinting some limits of these devices.

If you need to assure better parameters, then you may consider using licensed spectrum, full-duplex, non-adaptative modulation scheme devices. So maybe not PTP at all!
