we have canopy ap at a place where there are 802.11b/g radios in operations. the sms on ap r finding trouble keeping the links & latency varies fro 25 to 400 ms when connection holds.
we also have a backhaul which keeps on performing well…
Will using CMM help from losing links on account of interference from 802.11b/g radios…
How d i avoid the interference from 802.11b/g radios…?
Or I need to relocate…Canopy Infrastructure
We r on 2.4 Ghz. AP & Back Hauls r separated by around 15 meters of horizontal separation & 9 mtrs of vertical.But 802.11b/g radios are almost in couple of meters of distance .
matrixsup wrote: we have canopy ap at a place where there are 802.11b/g radios in operations. the sms on ap r finding trouble keeping the links & latency varies fro 25 to 400 ms when connection holds.
we also have a backhaul which keeps on performing well..
Will using CMM help from losing links on account of interference from 802.11b/g radios..
How d i avoid the interference from 802.11b/g radios..?
Or I need to relocate..Canopy Infrastructure
Separation is the best thing you can do. Can you coordinate with the
802.11 users in the building to use opposite ends of the band?
If not, then you're best to either relocate or change to 5.2 or 5.7.
Dan
shouldnt canopy is the best gear that will get interference impact if, there are lots of 802.11b/g equipment in the area?
Thats why my last post, i suggest that canopy may want to put another option in the SM/AP config page: Extreame Power :lol: instead Normal and Low Power
In my area, i got even more interference, all taiwanese gears use amplifier around 5 watt.
The regulations do not allow Motorola t do that. 8)
More power will only help the transmit anyway. If your interference is on the
receiver, then more power isn’t the answer.
Coordination is the answer. If you can’t work something out with the 802.11
crowd, then it’s time to move the equipment elsewhere.
5-watts on 802.11? Wow, if the amp is dirty, it’ll kill the whole band.
I was just refering to a standard Canopy document called tech faq.there it mentioned that canopy performance is not affected by 802.11b/g devices… :o
Not sure in what context this statement appears in this document.
yes, in my country, righnow they are playing with 5 watt amplifier.
6 month ago, they are playing with 0.5 - 1 watt amp.
maybe next month all of them using 10Watt ampli?
maybe next year they are using 100w ampli? :lol:
I love this country… :lol:
mnet wrote: yes, in my country, righnow they are playing with 5 watt amplifier.
6 month ago, they are playing with 0.5 - 1 watt amp.
maybe next month all of them using 10Watt ampli?
maybe next year they are using 100w ampli? :lol:
I love this country...... :lol:
Indonesia, right? :-D
your best bet would be to go with 5.7
wow…didnt know that many people know our country 8)
Yes, in these few years WISP become more and more, interference became acceptable, as long as we can googling or yahoo…
5.7, and 5.8 belong to our bigest celular operator (indosat).
The one and only free channel only 2.4. so you can imagine that…
the most important thing why WISP became more and more popular here is because our goverment wont give us use their cooper wire. and thx God we have canopy instead.
Rightnow im head to head competition with our TELKOM in serving my region. Im waiting for 2006 when wimax became available, or canopy new products that totally nonLOS.
And yes im sure we can kick TELKOM ass !! :twisted:
Our motto is: go to hell TELKOM … :lol:
I love this country… 
mnet wrote: wow...didnt know that many people know our country 8)
Yes, in these few years WISP become more and more, interference became acceptable, as long as we can googling or yahoo..
5.7, and 5.8 belong to our bigest celular operator (indosat).
The one and only free channel only 2.4. so you can imagine that...
the most important thing why WISP became more and more popular here is because our goverment wont give us use their cooper wire. and thx God we have canopy instead.
Rightnow im head to head competition with our TELKOM in serving my region. Im waiting for 2006 when wimax became available, or canopy new products that totally nonLOS.
And yes im sure we can kick TELKOM *** !! :twisted:
Our motto is: go to hell TELKOM .... :lol:
I love this country...... :wink:
5.7, and 5.8 belong to our bigest celular operator (indosat) ---> a little bit wrong :-) Indosat didn't have licanse of 5,7. Only 7 company that have license of 5,7. in Indonesia... 5,7 band is licensed band :-D
regards,
mrdlnf
n7slc wrote: More power will only help the transmit anyway. If your interference is on the
receiver, then more power isn't the answer.
Great answer n7slc you are absolutely correct. If you have 802.11b/g, AP's, and BH's all in 2.4 GHz then I have to question how much of the band is available. How many AP's do you have up there and is the BH a master or slave? If you turn one of the AP's into an SM what does the spectrum analysis show? Can you post a link to a screen capture of the spectrum analysis?
I will post asap.
We have 1 AP & 1 BH-Master at the central Site.The spectrum when i turn AP into SM looks like as follows.We set AP freq.to 2415mhz .BackaHaul to
2427.5 mhz.
http://www.matrixsurat.com/canopy1.jpg
The backHaul is around 10 meters away & 6 meters lower .
CMM does not exisits.
your not going to be running any 2.4 in this area, maybe horizontal
Asked the ISP to switch All 802.11b.g & shifted couple of customers to
Canopy SM.Now things r ok.