NAT Problems

Products PMP
21

So I was right in saying that the RF Public and NAT Public have to be different.

Then, if a user wants to access the SM via an AP, the RF Public interface is not necessary. Should one want to access the SM directly using it’s own address, leave the RF Public turned on, and give it a unique address within your network.

Has anyone tried to see if the SM web GUI will respond to the NAT Public address?

Thanks for everyones input.

Aaron

22
acherman wrote:

Has anyone tried to see if the SM web GUI will respond to the NAT Public address?


It will not.

Matt
23

I guess that answers that.

Thanks Matt.

Aaron