# SM Frame Utilization

**URL:** <https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/sm-frame-utilization/41417>\
**Category:** Available Now\
**Created:** [August 18, 2015, 7:27am UTC](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/sm-frame-utilization/41417 "2015-08-18T07:27:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eric\_Ozrelic](https://d10gw3vjmzyp8.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.cambiumnetworks.com/eric_ozrelic/32/16188_2.png) [@Eric\_Ozrelic](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/u/Eric_Ozrelic)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2015, 7:27am UTC](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/sm-frame-utilization/41417/1 "2015-08-18T07:27:26Z")

</div>

I've been using the new frame utilization statistics for PMP450 AP's using the 13.4 firmware and it's been very helpful in troubleshooting and monitoring an AP's overall health. Would there be a way to break up the frame utilization and display it on a per-SM basis? This would provide a valuable tool to find SM's that not only have poor rf conditions, but also are being used frequently... possibly to the detriment of the AP's overall performance. Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RayS](https://d10gw3vjmzyp8.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.cambiumnetworks.com/rays/32/11680_2.png) [@RayS](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/u/RayS)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2015, 11:40am UTC](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/sm-frame-utilization/41417/2 "2015-08-18T11:40:33Z")

</div>



---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GMMChance](https://d10gw3vjmzyp8.cloudfront.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/8dc957/32.png) [@GMMChance](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/u/GMMChance)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2015, 8:28pm UTC](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/sm-frame-utilization/41417/3 "2015-09-18T20:28:44Z")

</div>

A great recommendation +1'd especially if we can monitor via snmp

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Charlie](https://d10gw3vjmzyp8.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.cambiumnetworks.com/charlie/32/11598_2.png) [@Charlie](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/u/Charlie)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2015, 9:19pm UTC](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/sm-frame-utilization/41417/4 "2015-10-13T21:19:22Z")

</div>

> * * *
> [@Eric Ozrelic](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/u/Eric_Ozrelic/summary) wrote:  
> 
> I've been using the new frame utilization statistics for PMP450 AP's using the 13.4 firmware and it's been very helpful in troubleshooting and monitoring an AP's overall health. Would there be a way to break up the frame utilization and display it on a per-SM basis? This would provide a valuable tool to find SM's that not only have poor rf conditions, but also are being used frequently... possibly to the detriment of the AP's overall performance. Thanks!
> 
> * * *

Eric,

Definitely a good idea. The challenge comes for tracking up to 238 SMs.

Or another idea is only showing X top users of the frame.&nbsp;  
We definitely consider this in the future.  
-Charlie

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eric\_Ozrelic](https://d10gw3vjmzyp8.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.cambiumnetworks.com/eric_ozrelic/32/16188_2.png) [@Eric\_Ozrelic](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/u/Eric_Ozrelic)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2016, 9:00pm UTC](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/sm-frame-utilization/41417/5 "2016-01-24T21:00:19Z")

</div>

Yeah, I think that would be ideal Charlie... something on the same frame utilization tab... that shows top 10 SM's over 1, 5, and 10minute averages.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guilherme](https://d10gw3vjmzyp8.cloudfront.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/77aa72/32.png) [@Guilherme](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/u/Guilherme)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2016, 2:25am UTC](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/sm-frame-utilization/41417/6 "2016-01-25T02:25:10Z")

</div>

Or the statistics could be gathered by&nbsp;the stations, and just fetched and displayed by code in the AP web interface.&nbsp;  
  
That would give you the top users, at least.  
  
By cross referencing the station's metrics and the AP's total sent packets one could infer the total dropped (lost/invalid) packet metrics, and that could be used to pinpoint overall network quality.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ted\_Stewart](https://d10gw3vjmzyp8.cloudfront.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/71e660/32.png) [@Ted\_Stewart](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/u/Ted_Stewart)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2016, 5:26pm UTC](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/sm-frame-utilization/41417/7 "2016-03-30T17:26:06Z")

</div>

I made up a spreadsheet for the PMP320s that accomplished this&nbsp;from the MCS uplink and downlink data. &nbsp;Something similar that displayed bytes sent and recieved per modulation would open that ability up, particularly if it also included session time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ted\_Stewart](https://d10gw3vjmzyp8.cloudfront.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/71e660/32.png) [@Ted\_Stewart](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/u/Ted_Stewart)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2016, 5:26pm UTC](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/sm-frame-utilization/41417/8 "2016-03-30T17:26:48Z")

</div>

In terms of performance, the SM could track their own data individually, and the AP could poll it on request.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CambiumMatt](https://d10gw3vjmzyp8.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.cambiumnetworks.com/cambiummatt/32/33533_2.png) [@CambiumMatt](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/u/CambiumMatt)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2018, 9:41pm UTC](https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t/sm-frame-utilization/41417/9 "2018-10-19T21:41:15Z")

</div>

Session Status screens display lots more (sortable) information that is useful for exactly this.&nbsp; If this doesn't cover what you intended, please submit a new idea with suggestions for further improvement.
