8.2 and NAT

BigTrumpet · October 15, 2007, 8:15pm

Unfortunately, it seems that the 8.2 + NAT problem persists.
I upgraded to 8.2.1 and in few hours the SM crashed twice.
This is my log:

00:00:00 UT : 01/01/01 : File src/root.c : Line 417 System Startup
00:00:00 UT : 01/01/01 : File src/root.c : Line 422 Software Version : CANOPY 8.2.1 SM-DES
00:00:00 UT : 01/01/01 : File src/root.c : Line 426 Software Boot Version : CANOPYBOOT 3.0
00:00:00 UT : 01/01/01 : File src/root.c : Line 436 FPGA Version : 100207
00:00:00 UT : 01/01/01 : File src/root.c : Line 440 FPGA Features : DES, Sched
16:37:25 UT : 10/15/07 : File src/syslog.c : Line 1283 Time set
18:08:33 UT : 10/15/07 : File src/nibuf.c : Line 448
NiGetBuf(): Out of buffers: SrcLUID == 260
Used Bufs: 1384 Total Bufs: 3000 NoBufs: 0
Buffer Allocation:
LUID: 257 Used: 32 Max: 2048 NoBufs: 0
LUID: 258 Used: 1 Max: 3000 NoBufs: 0
LUID: 260 Used: 1351 Max: 1350 NoBufs: 0

I am very disappointed…
Anyone still has the same problem?

Ciao
Massimo

twinkletoes · October 16, 2007, 3:39pm

Report this to Motorola, please.

mkappa · October 16, 2007, 6:32pm

I have the same problem with 8.2.1 NAT enable!!!

Motorola…
But, anyone of development team read the technical support case opened or this forum??

And Motorola still stay silent.

Best Regards…

Fabio Marocco

BigTrumpet · October 16, 2007, 8:22pm

twinkletoes wrote:
Report this to Motorola, please.

I already reported to italian motorola distributor.
Hope they will forward to motorola us.

ciao
massimo

Anonymous1 · October 16, 2007, 8:40pm

Meh. I’m beginning to think I’ll just abandon 8.2.x on anything but APs. 8.1.5.1 never gave me any troubles.

PWH · October 16, 2007, 11:25pm

if ur going to use any 8.X use 8.2.1 working pretty good for me its been almost 3 days

Anonymous1 · October 17, 2007, 3:28am

8.2 was a disaster for us. We ran 8.1.5.1 on many access points and SMs for almost the entirety of its release with no troubles. I’ll be going back to that until I know for sure that 8.2.1 is safe.

BigTrumpet · October 17, 2007, 9:40am

wifiguy wrote:
I'll be going back to that until I know for sure that 8.2.1 is safe.

Same to me. If you use SM with NAT enabled you should stay to 8.1.5.1

jjs70 · October 17, 2007, 3:38pm

I just TRASHED my 2.4 system (which has worked great for years) by upgrading it to version 8.2. My customers are pissed and having nothing but problems since. I think I will have to take the system to an earlier version as well!

"IF IT AIN’T BROKE, DON’T FIX IT!"

JS