CnMaestro - 1-6 months for example of signal level reporting. This could help determine antenna alignment and tree growth issues.
I think it would be especially nice if we could somehow have a layout that shows SMs with the most signal degradation over x amount of time. This would allow us to do some proactive fixes/relocations/tree trimming
I'd even put forward 12 months of retention so you can get a true year-over-year analysis of degradation - we do this in our legacy graphing system and it is monumentally helpful to compare i.e. this April during the bloom vs. last April.
More than a year.- for us with our cacti graphs, it is ESSENTIAL to have a bit more than a year... like 14 or 16 months.
If a client calls with a speed problem, they usually say "it's been slow for the last few weeks" and if we only have 1 year... the "last few weeks" from last year have scrolled off already. We need not 52 weeks... but at least 56w
(and preferably 16 months)
I agree!! I would suggest a MINIMUM of 14 months.