ePMP Release 4.3.2 is now available

Products ePMP
61

@Fedor

Your post is a little confusing. So you say no bandwidth increase but then the graph and your next line in the post says there's a 10% throughput increase.

Will this increase happen with N-based AP's  and clients as well or only 3k AC AP's with N clients?

62
@dcshobby wrote:

@Fedor

Your post is a little confusing. So you say no bandwidth increase but then the graph and your next line in the post says there's a 10% throughput increase.

Will this increase happen with N-based AP's  and clients as well or only 3k AC AP's with N clients?

I've confirmed, this increase will happen with N-based AP's and clients... even the 2.4GHz will see this little increase!

63
@dcshobby wrote:

@Fedor

Your post is a little confusing. So you say no bandwidth increase but then the graph and your next line in the post says there's a 10% throughput increase.

Will this increase happen with N-based AP's  and clients as well or only 3k AC AP's with N clients?

I'm sorry. It was the typo.

From test results we have +10% bandwidth increase.

Thank you.

64

I noticed this in the cnMaestro cloud for my old pure 2.4 GHz ePMP1000 infrastructure:

Does this mean that valuable changes have been made to the firmware, maybe QoS will now work?

Should I finally update my devices to see any benefits?

65
@Anansy wrote:

I noticed this in the cnMaestro cloud for my old pure 2.4 GHz ePMP1000 infrastructure:

Does this mean that valuable changes have been made to the firmware, maybe QoS will now work?

Should I finally update my devices to see any benefits?

I would not update any strictly legacy 802.11n e1k/e2k 2.4 or 5GHz radios to 4.X yet.

QoS/MIR is still not available on that build. It will be relased in 4.4 coming soon.

That being said, there are some minor performance optimizations (like short GI and LDPC) for legacy radios running 4.X.

2 Likes
66

mismo problema con un sector epmp 1000  y  SM´s  force 200 ambos con firmware 4.3.2, esto no sucedia en  firmware 3.5.6.

ejemplo: kernel: [1191288.870000] SM disassociated from AP[XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX] F=5960 11naht20. Reason: 33 (GPFs M

como puedo ralizar un downgrade? 

67
Sakid Ahmed
  
Moderator
 
‎04-25-2019 04:09 PM
Re: ePMP Release 4.3.2 is now available
@brubble1 wrote:

So am I just not seeing it or still no DFS for F300 ? 

Just a bit more patience. Waiting on the govt to invite us and test DFS in the labs.

We anticipate to have this done within the month of May.

Well, May came and went, only been saying "soon" for over a year now. 

Any chance it will be in the beta firmware supposedly arriving "this week" sometime ?

68
@brubble1 wrote:
Sakid Ahmed
   
Moderator
 
‎04-25-2019 04:09 PM
Re: ePMP Release 4.3.2 is now available
@brubble1 wrote:

So am I just not seeing it or still no DFS for F300 ? 

Just a bit more patience. Waiting on the govt to invite us and test DFS in the labs.

We anticipate to have this done within the month of May.

Well, May came and went, only been saying "soon" for over a year now. 

Any chance it will be in the beta firmware supposedly arriving "this week" sometime ?

We are about 30 days away or sooner. Checking to see if our upcoming beta will support DFS for the -16/-25 in Sm mode which we can technically do. 

69

Thanks Fedor ... QOS is really affceting our Capacity Expansions ..

I saw BETA version 4.4 available for test since June 19th 

What is ETD for the 4.5 FW  ??

We need  anmd ETD to report to our Stakeholders  ..thanks for your promt answer 

70

Official 4.4 release will have QOS but at this moment the beta release ALSO has QOS. Could you evaluate QOS in the beta release? 

Official 4.4 is a few weeks away.

1 Like
71

We have tested the Current Beta Test for QOS , the results are not consistent in the Control of Bandwidth for opur Packages for 40 Mbps , specially in the UPLOAD speeds 

Below the results for a package 40Mbps down/20 Mbps Upload  , Tested in a controlled Environment using the Force-180 ( 4 subscriber  in the AP , only one doing the transfer process )

We have confirmed that in 40 Mbps the results are inconsistent in the UPLOD , see the details ( red Color )

IP_ADDRESS

TEST_DATE

TIME_ZONE

DOWNLOAD_MEGABITS

UPLOAD_MEGABITS

LATENCY_MS

SERVER_NAME

DISTANCE_MILES

CONNECTION_MODE

186.65.91.230

6/26/2019 11:52 PM

GMT

24.88

12.12

9

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/26/2019 11:53 PM

GMT

25.08

12.07

8

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/26/2019 11:53 PM

GMT

25.11

12.18

10

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/26/2019 11:54 PM

GMT

25.12

12.37

9

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/26/2019 11:55 PM

GMT

25.05

12.04

7

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/27/2019 12:04 AM

GMT

24.7

19.34

9

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/27/2019 12:05 AM

GMT

39.33

19.35

9

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/27/2019 12:05 AM

GMT

36.54

2.4

8

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/27/2019 12:07 AM

GMT

20.17

3.23

10

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/27/2019 12:08 AM

GMT

38.99

2.66

9

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/27/2019 12:09 AM

GMT

39.5

2.91

9

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/27/2019 12:12 AM

GMT

39.03

3.19

17

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/27/2019 12:13 AM

GMT

39.34

4.14

8

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/27/2019 12:14 AM

GMT

39.88

19.44

10

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/27/2019 12:15 AM

GMT

39.87

4.46

7

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/27/2019 12:16 AM

GMT

39.87

3.36

8

Belize City

0

multi

186.65.91.230

6/27/2019 12:17 AM

GMT

39.92

4.17

8

Belize City

0

multi