I took a look at the 450i and 100 colocation whitepaper, and for a full cluster it recommends replacing two 900 PMP100 APs back to back with 450i APs at once. That leaves me with a bunch of customers without service while I run around upgrading their SMs, which I'm not a huge fan of. As an additional complication, the white paper states that the PMP100 front to back ratio isn't very good in comparison to the 450i, so you don't want a 450i and 100 opposite one another on the same frequency.
Ideally, I want to play around with frequencies so that I can mount the 450i APs one at a time alongside the PMP100 cluster while I get the SMs upgraded to reduce downtime. The white paper doesn't mention this case, and I wanted to see if anybody has had any luck migrating without downtime.
I'm seeing two possibilities. The first is to change the PMP100 cluster to ABABAB, and use channel C for the first 450i AP I put up. That's tricky, as it would impact performance for customers that aren't in the same direction as the 450i is pointing, so I may not have a viable solution to fix them.
The second possibility is to change the 100 cluster from ABCABC to ACBACB, so that a N facting 450i could use channel C without having either the PMP100 facing that way or the PMP100 facing the opposite direction on the same frequency, but I still have frequency reuse between the 450i and 100 APs so there will be some self interference.
Has anybody tried this, and if so which approach did they find works better?