That’s my question also – is there any difference from 5.9.2-RC5, or was RC5 determined to be stable, and this IS that candidate, just renamed? I have a couple RC5 sectors & their SMs (which seem to be doing well) but just wondering if I should bother moving them to 5.9.2 Release version, or if they actually aleady are on the Release Version anyway.
Try to downgrade to the last recommended version 5.9.0, we are downgrading all our network to this version with better results and no downlinks or timeouts. At now this is best version, at least for us…
Regards!
I upgraded a few towers early this morning and ALL of them had huge increases of CPU use.
An example was one epmp3000 with only 12 subs went from 13% to 61%!!!
This is wild and cannot be expected. I imagine theres new features, but i have not turned on any packet inspection stuff and ALL APs and ALL SMs have had these massive jumps in CPU use.
We’ve updated our entire network of e1/e3k/e4k… hundreds of radios and have not experienced that with 5.9.2. So I’m wondering if there’s something different in our configurations?
Second… are you sure that the extra CPU usage is causing an issue? Even if I was experiencing unusually high CPU usage, unless it was impacting traffic, I’d leave it on 5.9.2 and work with support to help identify the issue. It may all just be a superficial reporting issue.
It doesn’t look to have effected traffic. I can still get 370Mbps to a cpe router. Pretty horrible to see a jump that high though, and on ALL APs and CPE radios put on 5.9.2. Its a shame too as I’ve seen some modulation stability improvements. Probably a good idea to open a ticket and work through it though.