I’m pretty sure I’ve seen cambium white papers for ePMP sync the have said in one paragraph that the distance setting is not required to be the same for sync to work but is strongly recommended and two paragraphs later say it is “required” for sync to work properly. There have been several posts over the years of people posting “proof” it drifts if you don’t set them the same but I never really paid any attention to them because we have been doing GPS sync since the Canopy days and both Canopy and 450i absolutely required distance to be the same, and more when mixing Canopy with 450i , we have always kept distance the same across all APs of the same frequencies because I had enough problems to troubleshoot without adding “ I wonder if the distance setting not matching all the APs is causing this problem”.
You are right, in a ePMP ONLY network with GPS sync and frequency reuse, the distance must be set the same on ePMP APs with the same frequency. The distance plays a factor in the TDD DL & UL subframe duration and must be the same to eliminate self-interference.
Does this same rule apply for those AP’s that share adjacent channels?
When using Cambium’s sync spreadsheets, it appears as though there’s quite a bit of leeway allowed for different AP distances before sync issues are flagged. As an example, here’s 5 miles for one AP and 20 miles for another:
Eric, I was referring to ePMP APs only sync. When it comes to synchronization with PMP, the ePMP-PMP Co-location tool must be used to guide the exact configuration of the 2 systems.
I edited my first reply to clarify that. (Thank you)